What is Whole Person Impairment?

ALL

Why is it Important to my Workers’ Compensation Case?

In California Workers’ Compensation Law, Applicants are assigned percentages for their disabilities. These percentages eventually translate into monetary compensation.

An Applicant’s percentage of disability is first established by determining the Applicant’s Whole Person Impairment or “WPI.” Medical evaluators are the individuals who make the determination as to what the WPI is for an individual.   The evaluator could be a Treating Doctor, a Qualified Medical Examiner, or an Agreed Medical Examiner.  In rare circumstances, a Judge can appoint a Regular Physician to make the assessment. Read more with the Law Offices of Edward J. Singer.

The Labor Code establishes the way of calculating and definition of Whole Person Impairment.  California Labor Code Section 4660(b)(1) provides that the “nature of the physical injury or disfigurement” shall incorporate the descriptions and measurements of physical impairments and the corresponding percentages of impairments published in the American Medical Association (AMA) Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (5th Edition).  In other words, the AMA Guide to Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (5th Edition) is the tool that physicians are required to employ to assess an individual’s impairment.

The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment 5th Edition defines impairment as “a loss, loss of use, or derangement of any body part, organ system, or organ function.”

The AMA Guides 5th Edition indicates that

“[a]n impairment can be manifested objectively, for example, by a fracture, and/or subjectively, through fatigue and pain. Although the Guides emphasizes objective assessment, subjective symptoms are included within the diagnostic criteria. According to the Guides, determining whether an injury or illness results in a permanent impairment requires a medical assessment performed by a physician. An impairment may lead to functional limitations or the inability to perform activities of daily living.”

The AMA Guides indicate that impairment percentages or ratings developed by medical specialists are consensus-derived estimates that reflect the severity of the medical condition and the degree to which the impairment decreases an individual’s ability to perform common activities of daily living (ADL), excluding work. Impairment ratings were designed to reflect functional limitations and not disability. The Whole Person Impairment (WPI) percentages listed in the Guides estimate the impact of the impairment on the individual’s overall ability to perform Activities of Daily Living, excluding work, as listed in Table 1-2.

Activities of Daily Living

Table 1-2 defines Activities of Daily Living.  This term is frequently abbreviated in reporting as ADLs.  The ADLs are:

  •  Self-care: urinating, defecating, brushing teeth, personal hygiene combing hair, bathing, dressing oneself, eating.
  • Communication: writing, typing, seeing, hearing, speaking.
  • Physical Activity: standing, sitting, reclining, walking, climbing stairs.
  • Sensory function: hearing, seeing, tactile feeling, tasting, smelling.
  • Nonspecialized Grasping: lifting, tactile, hand activities discrimination.
  • Travel: riding, driving, flying.
  • Sexual function: orgasm, ejaculation, lubrication, erection.
  • Sleep: restful, nocturnal.

Why are ADLs, Activities of Daily Living, important?

The physician evaluating an Injured Worker will take an inventory of their ADLs.  Usually, a physician will present the Injured Worker with a pre-printed form which contains questions about ADLs. The physician may assign a greater impairment if the medical disability has a significant impact to their Activities of Daily Living.  In the AMA Guides, there are certain tables for which ADL impact allows the doctor to increase or decrease an impairment.

Are there any other impairments besides Whole Person Impairments? Why is this important?

In the AMA Guides, besides Whole Person Impairment, there are a number of other impairments.  These other impairments can create confusion when a layperson looks at a medical report.  Most times, the other impairments have a lesser value than the Whole Person Impairment compensation. Because of this, an Injured Worker might believe their rating is higher if the doctor does not convert the impairment to WPI.

Doctors, in generating their reports, have to use these other impairments in order to calculate the Whole Person Impairment.  The other impairments include an Upper Extremity Impairment and a Lower Extremity Impairment. For the Upper Extremities, impairments are further broken down to Hand Impairment, Index/Middle Finger Impairment, Right/Little Finger Impairment and Thumb Impairment. For Vision, there is a Visual System Impairment Rating which is used in part to generate a Whole Person Impairment Rating for injuries to the Eye.

For the Upper and Lower Extremity Impairments, they are of a lesser value than a Whole Person Impairment.  An Upper Extremity Impairment is only 60 percent of the value of a Whole Person Impairment. Therefore, a 10 percent Upper Extremity Impairment translates into a 6 percent Whole Person Impairment.  Also, a Lower Extremity Impairment is only a 40 percent value of a Whole Person Impairment. Therefore, a 10 percent Lower Extremity Impairment translates into a 4 percent Whole Person Impairment.

Therefore, when you are analyzing medical reports, you must pay attention to what type of impairment has been assigned. Also, evaluators sometimes make mistakes in assessing the impairments.  Sometimes, they can assign the wrong type of impairment. The Impairments listed in any doctor’s report should be double-checked for accuracy.

Is a Psychiatric Injury assigned Whole Person Impairment differently?

In California, Psychiatric Injuries are to be assessed upon a Global Assessment of Function Score (GAF.)   A GAF score is a number which is generally assigned Psychiatrist or Psychologist. It measures both Symptom Severity and Level of Functioning.   This GAF score is then translated into a Whole Person Impairment. The conversion page is located on page 1-16 of the Scedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities.  http://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/PDR.pdf

How Do Physicians in California Use the Guides in Determining Whole Person Impairment?

In California, physicians writing impairment reports have an obligation to follow a strict interpretation of the Guides in assigning a Whole Person Impairment. Caselaw, however, allows them to deviate from this strict interpretation. There is a series of cases called Almaraz/Guzman cases which essentially indicate that “ based upon the physician’s judgment, experience, training, and skill each reporting physician (treater or medical-legal evaluator) should give an expert opinion on the injured employee’s WPI using the chapter, table, or method of assessing impairment of the AMA Guides that most accurately reflects the injured employee’s impairment.” In summary, Almaraz Guzman allows the physician to use the “four corners” of the Guides when making an assessment of whole person impairment.

Also, there are some circumstances in which the AMA Guides does not contain a table or a chart for which to assess a particular medical condition. Again, the physician, in those circumstances, is to employ the four corners of the Guides to make the most accurate assessment of one’s whole person impairment.

After a WPI is assigned, How is Permanent Disability Calculated?

After a WPI is accessed, the WPI is adjusted for a diminished future earning capacity multiplier (currently for injuries after 1/1/13, the multiplier is 1.4, i.e. if the WPI is 10, then it would be adjusted to 14) and for age and occupation.

In order to perform the calculation, the Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities is used. The following is a link to the publication.  http://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/PDR.pdf. In Workers’ Compensation,  all of the numbers and adjustments are written out to show how the formula derived the rating. The industry term for it is the “rating string.”

With more than 23 years of expertise in defending workers’ rights, the Law Offices of Edward J. Singer, A Professional Law Corporation, is here to assist. If you have any questions concerning your rights, please do not hesitate to contact our offices. Please contact us today if you have questions or are in need of a workers’ compensation attorney.

Image by ESB Professional / Shutterstock

Contact an Attorney

 

Serving the Greater Los Angeles Area

Serving the Greater Los Angeles Area

Our offices are located at 2222 South La Brea Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90016 just north of I-10 off of Exit 8 in Los Angeles’ Mid City neighborhood.

Office Location


Law Offices of Edward J. Singer APLC
2222 South La Brea Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90016

Get Directions

 

TESTIMONIALS

Terrific Lawyer!

Mr. Singer did an excellent job on my husband’s case. My husband got injured at work and we spoke to several lawyers who seemed to run their firms like a mill. We finally met with Ed. He met us on the weekend and I was amazed of his knowledge of not only workman’s compensation law, but also medical issues. He fought very hard for us. His staff of paralegals were also wonderful. I would recommend Ed.

-Janice, a Workers Compensation client

He Handled my Case

Mr. Singer took the case of my case. He arranged for treatment and evaluations. He deposed the doctor on my case and got me a settlement with future medical care. I was happy what he did for me.

-anonymous

Top Worker’s Comp Lawyer for Injured Workers

As a peer of Ed Singer, I strongly endorse him. He really knows the worker’s comp law and procedure. I have seen him in action. He fights to get injured workers the best medical treatment and compensation for his clients.

If you’re injured on the job, Ed would be the first attorney I would recommend. I’ve referred cases to him in the past with positive results.

-Alan

GREAT LAWYER!

I have recommended seven people to Ed and they all have been happy. Call him and he will call back.

-a Workers Compensation client

Helpful

Pointed me in the right direction and showed compassion. Thank you!

-Matthew Baker

I TRUST HIM!!!

I’ve been with Mr. Singer since 2007….. This case has been drawn out due to my previous employers’ lack of accountability. I appreciate the fact that Ed has been consistent and continues to fight the fight for me to get what is right…. A lot of other Attorneys would have told me to give up and accept the measly settlement they have offered, believe me, I’ve been tempted because it’s been a long road of B.S. However, because he believes what they have done is wrong and discriminatory towards me, he continues to battle for me and my greater good without having received a red cent, and for that I am truly grateful! I appreciate that he is available to discuss things via telephone, or in the office, although sometimes it is a few weeks out, I understand. I have entrusted him to handle my case and I let him do his work, and know that I will be notified of any pertinent information. However, I am not one that needs to be updated daily on the status because I know my previous employer is dragging their feet on the whole thing, they are a government agency after all. Sooooo, thank you, Ed, for your continued support and determination regarding my case!!!

-Chris, a Workers Compensation client

Workers Compensation

I contacted Mr. Singer thru AVVO message posting. I asked him if he could contact me back via email and he did the next day. He also allowed me to email him WC case-related documents before I talk to him on the phone. He also called me proactively from his end. When I called him after sending him emails first. He was very kind, professional, upfront and straight down to urgency business at hand.

He was also very supportive and understanding of my most complicated WC case and situations (another attorney previously indicated to me not able help me further due to complex nature of my case) and was willing to take more of his valuable time talking to me on the phone. Due to the complex nature of my case, he was also willing to meet with me at his office for further consultation.

Thank you, Mr. Singer, from bottom of my heart!

PS, Please also know Sergio of your office staff who contacted me back to schedule me a follow-up appointment with you was extremely kind and very friendly. Just talking to kind voices of Sergio and yourself on the phone, makes my visit so much easier with lesser pressure and stress.

-anonymous

Always Helpful

On countless occasions, Mr. Singer has taken my calls and has given me helpful advise in handling both my workers’ comp case and my employment issues. I am thankful that there are attorneys like him.

-anonymous

Helpful

Mr. Singer provided me with a free consultation. He took his time and explored all of the issues which concerned me. He provided me a game plan to deal with my legal issues. I am much appreciative.

-Harold

Thank you!

Mr. Singer took on my work comp case. It was complicated because the insurance denied the claim. He went to court and fought with them. they finally admitted I got hurt. He’s the best!

-Art